Archive for June, 2009

Warning Signs

29 June 2009

In a recent conversation at Kitchen Table Math, several ideas were mentioned for recognizing warning signs of a problem curriculum or teacher. This is my summary of that discussion.

If I spot any of these items in my child’s classroom, then I will worry that my child is receiving an unsatisfactory education.

Buzzwords

Use of terms like “inquiry-based”, “student-centered” or “interdisciplinary learning” – or any phrase that cannot be explained quickly using simple language.

Any use of the word “pedagogy” in regular conversation.

Curriculum Gaps

Absent or unsatisfactory coverage of key subject areas. This is subjective. Particular areas of concern: geography, history, English spelling and grammar.

Adoption of commercial textbooks with an unreasonable amount of online criticism. Again, subjective.

Projects

Assignment of project work where the students have not previously been given adequate instruction in the tools they need to do the work. For example:

  • “create a Powerpoint presentation about Napoleon” (when the child has never been explicitly taught how to use Powerpoint)
  • “research the causes of the Great Depression” (when the child has never been shown how to do library or online research)
  • “prepare and deliver a group presentation about the hydrologic cycle” (when the students have never been given guidance in how to divide up work within a team, or in how to use props effectively or deliver a compelling presentation)

Gimmicks

Tasks that appear to be intended merely to be “fun”, without education value commensurate with the effort required, instead of just delivering work results as a written report or oral presentation. For example, “make a T-shirt”, “build a diorama”, “write a rock song”.

Elementary Reading & Writing

24 June 2009

What are the major textbook series used in elementary schools (or by homeschoolers) for reading, writing or language arts? I haven’t found a comprehensive list elsewhere, so I’ll build my own list here. To start with, links to textbooks from major publishers:

Core Knowledge vs. 21st Century Skills

9 June 2009

A new conflict is developing around the general curriculum that is being used in elementary through high school education in the United States. The labels for the competing schools of thought are “21st century skills” and “core knowledge”. Both factions appear to be building lobbying organizations to encourage state education departments to commit to their approach.

The “21st century skills” movement is led by Partnership for 21st Century Skills (“P21″), with funding from several large technology firms and the national teachers’ union. P21 publishes a Framework for 21st Century Learning but there’s no specific curriculum guidance.

The “core knowledge” meme was started in the 1980s by E.D. Hirsch and is promoted by Hirsch’s Core Knowledge Foundation and by Common Core. CKF publishes specific curriculum guidelines in their Core Knowledge Sequence. CKF claims a large number of private schools as adopters of their approach, including the Stratford Schools in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Additions to list of math textbook selections

8 June 2009

Math textbook selections for some more elementary schools in the Bay Area:

Affluent & high-performing schools

4 June 2009

Fantastic conversation in the blogsphere regarding the dilemma of determining the contribution of the teachers and schools to student learning in affluent areas where school performance is high and parents supplement learning at home.

The conversation started with the alternative universe posting at kitchen table math, and continued at:

Also see these earlier KTM postings on affluent schools.

Laura M. says “you should not rely on your schools to educate your kids” and believes that since the kids are getting into college, it doesn’t matter what the schools are doing.

Harry B. thinks that schools in affluent areas get too much public funding anyway, and funds should be redirected elsewhere. Megan M. appears to agree.

Excellent discussion in the comment sections on all these blogs.

No world history in elementary school?

4 June 2009

Am I reading this correctly?

The California state content standards for history and social science (PDF, 68 pages, 846K) show zero coverage of world geography or history at the elementary school level. No identification of continents or countries on a map, no reading about Ancient Egypt, no conversation about national borders.

Those six years are entirely devoted to American and California state history and related topics.

Is it wise to postpone all discussion of the world beyond our borders until middle school? Won’t this leavee our children at a disadvantage on the world stage compared to students in those nations that have a more expansive definition of elementary social studies?

This looks like another area where concerned parents will supplement primary education at home, and the rest will fall behind.

List of math textbook series

3 June 2009

The following is a preliminary list of math textbook series currently in use in the United States for elementary math education. I’ll expand this list in the future with additional entries, lengthier program descriptions, and links to reviews and opinion.

Everyday Mathematics

Publisher: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill

Grade range: pre-K-6

History: Developed by the University of Chicago Mathematics Project. The Third Edition (2007) replaces previous versions from 2004 and 2001.

Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley enVisionMATH

Publisher: Pearson, owner of the Scott Foresman and Addison Wesley brands

Grade range: K-6

History: First published in 2008.

Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Mathematics (Diamond Edition)

Publisher: Pearson, owner of the Scott Foresman and Addison Wesley brands

Grade range: pre-K-6

History: the Diamond Edition succeeds earlier editions named Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Mathematics and Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley MATH.

Houghton Mifflin Math

Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

History: current edition is 2007

TERC Investigations in Number, Data, and Space

Publisher: Pearson, which sells the product under the Scott Foresman brand.

Grade range: K-5

History: Developed in the 1990s by TERC, originally under a National Science Foundation grant.

McDougal Littell Math

Publisher: Holt McDougal, a division of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

SRA Real Math

Publisher: SRA/McGraw-Hill

Saxon Math

Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

Grade range: Primary (K-4), Intermediate (3-5), Middle Grades (6-8), Secondary (Algebra 1 to Calculus)

History:
Published since 1993.
Saxon Publishers was acquired by Harcourt in 2004.

Singapore Math

Singapore Math refers to the Primary Mathematics textbook series, used in Singapore since 1982. These texts are distributed in the US by SingaporeMath.com Inc.

Grade range: 1-6

Math textbooks

2 June 2009

Several Bay Area public elementary school districts have recently selected new math textbooks for the coming 2009/10 school year.

California school districts usually review and adopt new textbooks every seven years.

Here we go…

2 June 2009

On this blog I will be collecting the results of my research into the modern education landscape.  I hope to look at comparisons between the US and other countries, but I will also be reviewing the options available locally (Silicon Valley, California).  What are the current trends in schooling?  How are things different today from the past, and are the changes good, bad or indifferent?